WORKFORCE COMPOSITION

WORKFORCE COMPOSITION

WORKFORCE COMPOSITION

Data statement

The workforce diversity data is taken using a snapshot of all employees based in the UK and under contract with WBD on the 31st of the month (which covers the period 1 April until 31 March).

Financial year
Reporting year
Snapshot date
Promotions effective date
2023/2024
2024
31/03/2024
01/07/2023
2024/2025
2025
31/03/2025
01/07/2024
2025/2026
2026
31/03/2026
01/07/2025

Please interpret proportions based on small populations (<22.5) with caution.

Protected characteristic proportions (%) are calculated including those who did share their information (including answer category 'prefer not to say') and those for whom we did not receive any information.

The diversity statistics in this report relate to our UK Equity Partner and Employee populations. Selection of 'Prefer not to say' and non-sharing of information, i.e., 'Information not provided', are included in the statistics therefore percentages represent the proportion of the entire population.

The Solicitors Regulatory Authority (SRA) data tool uses data that is based on responses only (including 'prefer not to say'). We have recalculated our firm-wide percentages to exclude the "information not provided" to allow for a like-for-like comparison between our diversity data and the SRA datasets that uses responses only.

Our colleagues are split into three major occupational groupings:

We report on data pertaining to colleagues' legal sex (female/male), rather than their gender (e.g. man/woman/non-binary/prefer to self-describe) as WBD currently holds a 100% data sharing rate for this protected characteristic. We recognise that sex does not equate with gender and that gender is not binary, and despite already collecting data on gender we aspire to enhance our data collection first so we can report on these in the future.

We aggregate all colleagues who identified as being from an ethnicity other than white into the grouping 'minoritised ethnic'. It should be noted that we do not currently have a category for white minority/other white backgrounds in our system, so colleagues who identify as being from a minoritised white background may have identified as ‘other ethnicity’, which has been included in the grouping ‘minoritised ethnic backgrounds’ or may have identified as white and be included in the white grouping.

We recognise the limitations of an assumption that minority ethnic colleagues are a homogenous group, but as we hold more granular ethnicity categories on our HR systems, we aspire to perform further in-depth analysis and reporting in future.

We are conscious of the limitations of our data regarding disability, for which we believe data sharing rates are low when comparing to national statistics and therefore do not represent all our colleagues with a disability or who are neurodivergent.

Partner
Fee-earners
Business professionals
Partner (FEP)
Legal Director
Executive Services
Partner (JEP)
Managing Associate
Support in Business Group
Partner (Salaried)
Associate
Business Services
Solicitor
Trainee Solicitor
Paralegal/Legal Executive
Other Fee Earner (e.g. legal counsel)

Total firmwide figures

Age

Age Group

16-24


2026

25-34


2026

35-44


2026

45-54


2026

55-64


2026

65 and over


2026

Sex

Female


2026

Male


2026

Ethnicity

For comparison when excluding 'Information not provided': Minoritised ethnic 9.5%; White 88.6%; Prefer not to say 1.9%.

Minoritised ethnic


2026

White


2026

Prefer not to say


2026

Information not provided


2026

Disability

For comparison when excluding 'Information not provided': Disabled 10.9%; No disability 85.1%; Prefer not to say 3.9%.

Disabled


2026

No disability


2026

Prefer not to say


2026

Information not provided


2026

Sexual orientation

For comparison when excluding 'Information not provided': LGBTQ+ 6.3%; Heterosexual/straight 89.3%; Prefer not to say 4.5%.

LGBTQ+


2026

Heterosexual / straight


2026

Prefer not to say


2026

Information not provided


2026

Social mobility - Type of school attended between 11-16

For comparison when excluding 'Information not provided': State-run or state-funded school 77.6%; UK independent/fee paying school 13.4%; Attended school outside the UK 5.9%; I don't know 1.0%; Prefer not to say 2.1%.

State-run or state-funded school


2026

UK independent/ fee-paying school


2026

Attended school outside the UK


2026

Other

0.0%


2026

I don't know


2026

Prefer not to say


2026

Information not provided


2026

Social mobility – Socio-economic background

(based on parental occupation at the age of 14)

For comparison when excluding 'Information not provided': Professional background 48.4%; Intermediate background 12.1%; Working class background 32.1%; Other 4.2%; Prefer not to say 3.2%.

Professional background


2026

Intermediate background


2026

Working class background


2026

Other


2026

Prefer not to say


2026

Information not provided


2026

Partner Composition 2024-2026

Average age (years)

All Partners

years


2026

years


2025

years


2024


Sex

Female Partners


2026


2025


2024


Ethnicity

All Partners from minoritised ethnic background


2026


2025


2024


Disability

All Partners who shared they have a disability


2026


2025


2024


Sexual orientation

All Partners who identify as LGBTQ+


2026


2025


2024


Social mobility - Type of school attended between 11-16

All Partners who attended state-run or state-funded school


2026


2025


2024

Promotion into partnership, 2024-2026

Female


2026


2025


2024

Male


2026


2025


2024

Senior leaders (Board and Support Directors)

Female


2026


2025


2024

Male


2026


2025


2024

Sex

The firm’s sex representation has remained consistent between 2024 and 2026, with women continuing to make up the majority of the workforce. In 2026, female representation stood at 65.8%, broadly in line with previous years, while male representation accounted for 34.2%, reflecting a stable overall profile.

Representation varies across major occupational groupings. Females continue to be well represented and make up the majority of Business Professionals (72.6%) across the period. Fee Earners also continue to be female majority (68.1% in 2026).

At Partner level, female representation has remained broadly stable at around 32% across all three years (around 24% at equity partner level only), providing a solid platform for us to continue our work toward gender equality at senior levels.

Looking forward, over 2026/27, we will continue to prioritise initiatives focused on progression, retention and leadership pathways, supporting further improvement in gender equality, especially at senior levels.

Headcount by job role and sex (%)

2024
2025
2026
Partner
Female
32.6%
31.9%
32.1%
Male
67.4%
68.1%
67.9%
Fee-earners
Female
66.7%
68.9%
68.1%
Male
33.3%
31.1%
31.9%
Business professionals
Female
74.7%
73.8%
72.6%
Male
25.3%
26.2%
27.4%
Firm wide (UK)
Female
65.9%
66.8%
65.8%
Male
34.1%
33.2%
34.2%

Ethnicity

Our data shows encouraging progress in ethnic diversity across the firm, with the strongest improvements at firm wide and fee earner levels.

Firm wide representation of colleagues from minoritised ethnic backgrounds increased steadily from 6.0% in 2024 to 8.6% in 2026, supported by improved data sharing rates. Amongst Fee Earners representation rose from 8.3% to 11.8%, while Business Professionals have seen steady increases, contributing to a stronger and more diverse talent pipeline.

At Partner level, progress has been more variable, with representation declining to 2.1% in 2026 following growth in the previous year (year on year proportional changes should be interpreted with caution due to low headcount). Our continued emphasis on targeted progression initiatives and succession planning through an ethnicity lens will support longer term improvement at senior levels.

Headcount by job role and ethnicity (%)

2024
2025
2026
Partner
Minoritised ethnic
3.5%
3.7%
2.1%
White
90.1%
88.9%
90.7%
Prefer not to say
1.4%
1.5%
2.1%
Information not provided
5.0%
5.9%
5.0%
Fee-earners
Minoritised ethnic
8.3%
9.5%
11.8%
White
68.3%
66.9%
71.6%
Prefer not to say
2.0%
2.3%
2.4%
Information not provided
21.4%
21.2%
14.2%
Business professionals
Minoritised ethnic
4.2%
5.8%
6.8%
White
83.7%
82.3%
85.6%
Prefer not to say
1.0%
1.0%
0.8%
Information not provided
11.1%
10.9%
6.8%
Firm wide (UK)
Minoritised ethnic
6.0%
7.3%
8.6%
White
77.2%
75.8%
79.7%
Prefer not to say
1.5%
1.7%
1.7%
Information not provided
15.2%
15.2%
10.0%

Disability

Disability data sharing increased steadily across the firm between 2024 and 2026, with firm wide representation rising from 8.8% to 9.8%. This positive upward trend, alongside a reduction in “information not provided”, reflects growing engagement with diversity data collection and strengthens confidence in the insights available to inform targeted action.

Representation increased across all major occupational groupings. At Partner level, those who shared having a disability rose gradually from 7.1% to 7.9%. Fee Earners recorded the largest year on year increase in sharing a disability, reaching 9.3% in 2026, while Business Professionals continue to report the highest representation at 11.0%. Levels of “prefer not to say” responses remain broadly stable.

Over 2026/27, the firm will build on this progress by continuing to encourage data sharing, and embedding inclusive leadership and accessible ways of working to support progression and retention.

Headcount by job role and disability (%)

2024
2025
2026
Partner
Disabled
7.1%
7.4%
7.9%
No disability
83.0%
81.5%
82.1%
Prefer not to say
5.0%
5.2%
5.0%
Information not provided
5.0%
5.9%
5.0%
Fee-earners
Disabled
8.1%
7.9%
9.3%
No disability
67.3%
67.1%
72.3%
Prefer not to say
3.2%
3.8%
4.2%
Information not provided
21.4%
21.2%
14.2%
Business professionals
Disabled
10.2%
10.7%
11.0%
No disability
75.6%
75.5%
79.8%
Prefer not to say
3.1%
3.0%
2.4%
Information not provided
11.1%
10.9%
6.8%
Firm wide (UK)
Disabled
8.8%
9.0%
9.8%
No disability
72.5%
72.2%
76.6%
Prefer not to say
3.4%
3.6%
3.5%
Information not provided
15.2%
15.2%
10.0%

Sexual orientation

Sexual orientation data sharing increased steadily between 2024 and 2026, with firm wide LGBTQ+ representation rising from 4.1% to 5.6%. This upward trend suggests growing confidence among colleagues to share their sexual orientation and reflects continued progress in fostering an inclusive and supportive workplace culture.

Data completeness has improved across all major occupational groupings, with “information not provided” decreasing from 15.2% to 10.0% firm wide. The most notable improvement is among Fee Earners, where missing data reduced from 21.4% to 14.2%, strengthening confidence in the reliability of the insights available.

LGBTQ+ representation has increased among Fee Earners (6.7%) and Business Professionals (5.2%). At Partner level, representation declined slightly to 2.9%, (reflecting a nominal reduction over the period).

Overall, the data highlights encouraging progress alongside a clear opportunity to strengthen senior representation. The firm will continue to embed inclusive leadership behaviours and support LGBTQ+ networks and initiatives, ensuring colleagues feel safe, valued and able to thrive authentically at work.

Headcount by job role and sexual orientation (%)

2024
2025
2026
Partner
LGBTQ+
3.5%
3.0%
2.9%
Heterosexual/ straight
89.4%
88.9%
89.3%
Prefer not to say
2.1%
2.2%
2.9%
Information not provided
5.0%
5.9%
5.0%
Fee-earners
LGBTQ+
4.9%
6.7%
6.7%
Heterosexual/ straight
71.6%
69.6%
74.5%
Prefer not to say
2.2%
2.5%
4.6%
Information not provided
21.4%
21.2%
14.2%
Business professionals
LGBTQ+
3.3%
4.0%
5.2%
Heterosexual/ straight
82.0%
81.1%
84.2%
Prefer not to say
3.5%
4.0%
3.8%
Information not provided
11.1%
10.9%
6.8%
Firm wide (UK)
LGBTQ+
4.1%
5.1%
5.6%
Heterosexual/ straight
78.0%
76.6%
80.3%
Prefer not to say
2.7%
3.1%
4.0%
Information not provided
15.2%
15.2%
10.0%

Social Mobility – Type of school attended between the ages 11-16

The firm continues to make positive progress in social mobility, with an increasing proportion of colleagues reporting attendance at state run or state funded schools. Firm wide representation rose from 63.9% in 2024 to 68.0% in 2026, reflecting continued success in attracting and retaining talent from a broad range of socio-economic backgrounds.

Business Professionals remain the group with the highest proportion of state educated employees (75.6%), followed by Fee Earners (63.6%). At Partner level, colleagues from state educated backgrounds continue to form the majority (57.9%), providing a solid foundation for further progress in the area of social mobility. Representation from UK independent schools (33.6%) remains more prevalent at Partner level.

Improved data completeness, with “information not provided” falling to 12.4%, strengthens confidence in these insights and reflects growing engagement with sharing social mobility information.

Overall, the data highlights encouraging momentum in socio economic diversity. Over 2026/27, the firm will continue to build on this progress by improving data completeness, embedding inclusive recruitment and progression practices, and supporting advancement into senior roles for colleagues from all socio-economic backgrounds.

Type of school attended between 11-16

2024
2025
2026
Partner
State-run or state-funded school
56.0%
58.5%
57.9%
UK independent/ fee-paying school
33.3%
30.4%
33.6%
Attended school outside the UK
2.1%
1.5%
1.4%
Other
0.7%
0.0%
0.0%
I don't know
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
Prefer not to say
2.1%
2.2%
2.1%
Information not provided
5.7%
7.4%
5.0%
Fee-earners
State-run or state-funded school
58.5%
57.6%
63.6%
UK independent/ fee-paying school
13.3%
12.1%
12.0%
Attended school outside the UK
3.8%
4.7%
5.6%
Other
0.2%
0.0%
0.0%
I don't know
0.0%
0.7%
0.5%
Prefer not to say
0.9%
1.3%
1.8%
Information not provided
23.4%
23.7%
16.4%
Business professionals
State-run or state-funded school
72.4%
71.4%
75.6%
UK independent/ fee-paying school
3.5%
5.0%
5.4%
Attended school outside the UK
5.2%
5.4%
5.6%
Other
0.4%
0.0%
0.0%
I don't know
0.0%
1.8%
1.4%
Prefer not to say
2.1%
2.0%
1.8%
Information not provided
16.3%
14.3%
10.2%
Firm wide (UK)
State-run or state-funded school
63.9%
63.5%
68.0%
UK independent/ fee-paying school
11.7%
11.2%
11.8%
Attended school outside the UK
4.2%
4.6%
1
Other
0.3%
0.0%
0.0%
I don't know
0.0%
1.1%
0.8%
Prefer not to say
1.5%
1.7%
1.9%
Information not provided
18.4%
17.9%
12.4%

Social Mobility – Occupation main household earner at age 14

The question “What was the occupation of your main household earner when you were aged about 14?” was introduced into the firm’s HR system in June 2024. Since then, data sharing rates have increased gradually. While overall completeness remains below the firm’s 60% threshold for fully robust analysis, the data available already provides useful indicative insights into colleagues’ social backgrounds.

In 2026, 16.7% of colleagues firm wide identified as coming from a working class background, with a further 6.3% reporting intermediate occupations (e.g., clerical worker, small business owner), highlighting the presence of meaningful socio-economic diversity across the firm. Representation of colleagues coming from a working class background is highest among Business Professionals (21.0%), followed by Fee Earners (14.9%), while Partners show lower reported representation at senior levels (8.6%).

Data gaps remain, with 47.9% firm wide recorded as “information not provided”, particularly among longer tenured colleagues. This presents a clear opportunity for continued engagement.

Overall, the data affirms a diverse socio economic profile within the firm. In 2026/27, focus will be placed on improving data completeness, particularly among colleagues with longer tenure, alongside strengthening inclusive progression pathways to support greater representation at senior levels over time.

Data for 2024 and 2025 is missing as this social-mobility question was introduced in June 2024 (post 2024 snapshot) and data sharing rates were still too low to be meaningful in 2025.

Occupation main household earner at age 14

2026
Partner
Professional background
26.4%
Intermediate background
5.0%
Working class background
8.6%
Other
0.7%
Prefer not to say
0.0%
Information not provided
59.3%
Fee-earners
Professional background
27.7%
Intermediate background
7.1%
Working class background
14.9%
Other
2.0%
Prefer not to say
1.8%
Information not provided
46.4%
Business professionals
Professional background
22.2%
Intermediate background
5.8%
Working class background
21.0%
Other
2.8%
Prefer not to say
2.0%
Information not provided
46.2%
Firm wide (UK)
Professional background
25.2%
Intermediate background
6.3%
Working class background
16.7%
Other
2.2%
Prefer not to say
1.7%
Information not provided
47.9%
Previous page

Gender Pay Gap

Back to Contents
Next page

Get in touch

Back to the contents

Copyright © 2026. “Womble Bond Dickinson”, the “law firm” or the “firm” refers to the network of member firms of Womble Bond Dickinson (International) Limited, consisting of Womble Bond Dickinson (UK) LLP and Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP. Each of Womble Bond Dickinson (UK) LLP and Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP is a separate legal entity operating as an independent law firm. Womble Bond Dickinson (International) Limited does not practise law. Please see www.womblebonddickinson.com/legal-notices for further details.